Evaluate the Shear Bond Strength for Alkasite in Comparison with other Esthetic Restorative Materials

Aims: To assess and compare the shear bond strength of alkasite restoration, as well as, to compare the shear bond strength between alkasite with and without bonding. Materials and methods: Twenty-five permanent maxillary premolars were used in which, with diamond disks, their buccal surfaces were flattened until a clear superficial dentinal surface could be seen. Samples were randomly assigned to five groups (n=5). Group 1: alkasite without adhesive, Group 2: alkasite with adhesive, Group 3: Nanohybrid composite, Group 4: Glass ionomer cement, and Group 5: Resin modified glass inomer cement. Following the recommendations of the manufacturers, cylinders of the five restorative materials were bonded to the buccal surfaces. Following 24 hours storage at 37C. The evaluation of shear bond strength was employed by the use of the universal testing machine. Under a stereomicroscope (20), the fracture mode was determined. Data were statistically analyzed using a nonparametric independent sample Kruskal-Wallis test at the confidence level of 95%. Result: There were statistical differences among groups and there was a significant difference between the alkasite with and without bonding. Conclusion: Alkasite with bonding showed a higher shear bond strength in comparison with GIC and resin-modified GIC, but still lower than that of nanohybrid composite Moreover, the shear bond strength of alkasite highly improved with the use of bonding.