A comparison among robust estimation methods for structural equations modeling with ordinal categorical variables.
Abstract
Categorical and ordered variables are commonly used in many scientific researches. Researchers often use the ML method, which assumes a multivariate normal distribution, and this is not true with categorical data because the normal state assumption is violated when a Likert scale is used which leads to shaded results.In this research, it has been suggested the robust MLR method with covariance matrix of the sample which deals with the data as it is a continuous data especially when the Likert scale is five or above. It has been suggested a method for reducing the error by linking error measurement, where a link was performed between three standard errors, and through the fit indices, it was obtained a good result in reducing the standard error of capabilities and improving the quality of fit indexes. It has been also used two of the robust methods, WLSMV method which known as RDWLS method, and ULSMV method which known as RULS method, use a polychoric correlation, each two methods deal with the data as it categorical. This research also included a comparison between the robust estimation methods ML , MLR , WLSMV and ULSMV and study its effects on the population corrected robust model fit indexes , and then select the best method for dealing with the categorical ordered data . The results showed a superiority of the robust methods in comparison with other methods, where it showed a robust corrections in the standard errors by using the polychoric correlation coefficient matrix, in addition to robust correction of the chi square. In addition of that, the fit indices is replaced by the robust fit indexes of chi- square robust, TLI, CFI and RMSIA.
References
- Asparouhov, T., & Muthn, B. O. (2010). Simple second order chi-square correction. Retrieved from: http://www.statmodel.com/download/WLSMV_new_chi21.pdf
- Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
- Brosseau-liard, P. E. et al. (2014) Adjusting Incremental Fit Indices for Nonnormality Adjusting Incremental Fit Indices for Nonnormality, (November), pp. 3741. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2014.933697.
- Brosseau-Liard, P. E., Savalei, V. and Li, L. (2012) An Investigation of the Sample Performance of Two Nonnormality Corrections for RMSEA, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47(6), pp. 904930. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2012.715252.
- Browne, M. W. (1984). Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37(1), 62-83.
- Browne, M.W. and Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Testing Structural Equation Models (eds. K.A. Bollen and J.S. Long), 136162. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications
- Course, A. S. (2013) Structural Equation Modeling: A Second Course (2nd ed.). Available at: https://books.google.com/books?id=1HAbAwAAQBAJ&pgis=1.
- Crisci, A. (2012) Quantitative Methods Inquires 3 ESTIMATION METHODS FOR THE STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS: MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD, PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES E GENERALIZED MAXIMUM ENTROPY, Journal of applied quantitative methods, 7(2), pp. 710.
- Flora, D. B. and Curran, P. J. (2004) An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data, Psychological Methods, 9(4), pp. 466491. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466.
- Gana,kamel;broc,guillaume.(2019). Structural equations modeling with lavaan,willey:iste
- Jackson, D. L. (2003). Revisiting sample size and number of parameter estimates: Some support for the N:q hypothesis. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 128141.
- Kline, R. B. (2015) TXTBK Principles and practices of structural equation modelling Ed. 4 ***, Methodology in the social sciences.
- Li, C. H. (2016) The performance of ML, DWLS, and ULS estimation with robust corrections in structural equation models with ordinal variables, Psychological Methods, 21(3), pp. 369387. doi: 10.1037/met0000093.
- Li, Y., Li, B. Y. and Li, Y. (2014) Confirmatory Factor Analysis with Continuous and Ordinal Data: An Empirical Study of Stress Level, Uppsala University, Department of Statistics.
- Micceri, T. (1989) The Unicorn, The Normal Curve, and Other Improbable Creatures, Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), pp. 156166. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.156.
- Muthn, B. O., du Toit, S. H. C., & Spisic, D. (1997). Robust inference using weighted leastsquares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categoricaland continuous outcomes. Retrieved from:http://gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/muthen/articles/Article_075.pdf.
- Nalbantolu Ylmaz, F. (2019) Comparison of Different Estimation Methods Used in Confirmatory Factor Analyses in Non-Normal Data: A Monte Carlo Study, International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 11(4), pp. 131140. doi: 10.15345/iojes.2019.04.010.
- Rigdon, E. E. (1996) CFI versus RMSEA: A comparison of two fit indexes for structural equation modeling, Structural Equation Modeling, 3(4), pp. 369379. doi: 10.1080/10705519609540052.
- Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variable analysis:Applications for developmental research (pp. 399-419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
- Savalei, V. and Rhemtulla, M. (2013) The performance of robust test statistics with categorical data, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 66(2), pp. 201223. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02049.x.
- Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. and Mller, H. (2003) Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures, MPR-online, 8(2), pp. 2374.
- Schumacker, R. E. and Lomax, R. G. (2010) A beginners guide to Structure Equating Modeling.
- Wang, J. and Wang, X. (2020). Structural Equation Modeling: Applications UsingMplus. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 1118356314.
- Xia, Y. and Yang, Y. (2018) The Influence of Number of Categories and Threshold Values on Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling with Ordered Categorical Data, Multivariate Behavioral Research. Routledge, 53(5), pp. 731755. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1480346.
- Xia, Y. and Yang, Y. (2019) RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods, Behavior Research Methods. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), pp. 409428. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1055-2.
- Yang-Wallentin, F., Jreskog, K. G. and Luo, H. (2010) Confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables with misspecified models, Structural Equation Modeling, 17(3), pp. 392423. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2010.489003.
- Yuan, K. H., Bentler, P. M. and Zhang, W. (2005) The effect of skewness and kurtosis on mean and covariance structure analysis: The univariate case and its multivariate implication, Sociological Methods and Research, 34(2), pp. 240258. doi: 10.1177/0049124105280200.