The fragmentation of symbols in Postmodern Performances: A Case Study of "Butterfly Ripples"
Abstract
The sign is an inherent part of life since the dawn of time, as our daily lives are filled with clear, coded, and other types of signs and symbols. Everything carries a certain meaning that refers to a specific denotation, whether direct or indirect. A detailed examination of these signs reveals multiple meanings, and we can journey from one sign to another into a galaxy of signs with a never-ending process. Signs appear in various forms; some are indivisible, while others are dynamic and fluid, never settling in the mind or confined to a specific meaning. These are commonly known as fragmented signs. In recent times, some art forms have moved away from the principle of directness, which typically creates a passive audience with limited imagination, unable to delve into the realms of ambiguous interpretations that allow for multiple options and complete freedom in forming their mental images. Consequently, the aesthetics of postmodern art are characterized by the fragmentation of signs, which is considered a fundamental aesthetic component. This characteristic provokes questions and open interpretations in the minds of the audience and art appreciators, creating a sense of intrigue and amazement through the use of enigma and ambiguity. This also establishes a mental challenge for the audience, representing a clear declaration of rebellion against conventional aspects, both in terms of content and artistic form. Thus, the researcher found it possible to study the fragmentation of signs in postmodern performances, using the play "Butterfly Ripples" as a case study. The study applies theoretical and analytical indicators to analyze the play, which are detailed in the research results and conclusions.