Consequences of Workplace Violence on Nursing Staff Who Working in Educational Baghdad Hospital

Section: Original Articles
Published
Oct 1, 2014
Pages
83-90

Abstract

Background and Objective: Violence at work is becoming an alarming phenomenon worldwide.Affecting the dignity of millions of people, violence is a major source of inequality, discrimination,stigmatization and conflict in the workplace. Therefore, a cross section study was conducted to assess thetypes of work place violence and to find out the consequences of work place violence on nursing staffwho working in educational Baghdad hospitalMaterial and Method: Sample was selected from intentional nurses those who work in BaghdadTeaching Hospital. (100) of nurses who agreed to participate in this study during the period fromFebruary to March 2012 in the city of Baghdad. Data was collected through the filled applicationquestionnaire form, descriptive statistical methods used in data analysis.Results: the results indicate that the highest percentage (25%) of the study sample in the age group (40-44) years, the mean age and SD of study sample is 36.79 8.70190. and (59%) of the study sample weremale, and the majority (95%) of them living in Baghdad. the highest percentage (47%) of study samplewere working in surgical ward. (46%) of study sample were at secondary school level. the highestpercentage (77%) of study sample were married. According to Workplace Violence Sources the highestgrade (92) at high level of RS of the work place Sources regarding Patient and his Relative refers to BadWorking conditions (excessive heat or cold, noise, bad furniture). Concerning Colleagues or Supervisorsthe highest grade (94.5) at high level of RS of the work place regarding colleagues or supervisorsviolence which refers to absence of proper insurance. According to the Consequences of WorkplaceViolence Level the highest grade (86.5) at moderate level of RS of the consequences on a personal levelfor nurses which refers to anger. The consequences on work level the highest grade (87) at moderate levelof RS refers to Underestimation and disrespect of the profession of nursing in the society. Concerningconsequences on health care setting the highest grade (90) at high level of RS refers to .more shortage ofhealthcare professionals (many healthcare professionals shift to other fields.Conclusion: The study highlights the sources of workplace on nurses. All study samples had experiencedworkplace violence either from patient and his relatives or from colleagues or supervisors. Exposure towork place violence often has a great consequences regarding personal, working and health setting levelon the satisfaction of nurses and the quality of health care service.Key words: Consequences, Workplace, Violence, Nursing Staff

References

  1. American Nursing Association. (2012). Workplace Violence.
  2. Chapman, R. et al. (2010). Examining the characteristics of workplace violence in one non-tertiary hospital., J Clin Nurs. 19. P.p. 479-88.
  3. Deeb, M. (2003). International Labour Office ILO International Council of Nurses ICN World Health Organisation WHO Public Services International PSI Joint Programme on Workplace Violence in the Health Sector LEBANON Country Case Study.
  4. Golubic R., Milosevic M., Knezevic B., & Mustajbegovic J. (2009). Work-related stress, education and work ability among hospital nurses, J Adv Nurs.65(10). P.p. 2056-66.
  5. Guidelines for coping with violence in the workplace. (1999). International Council of Nurses (ICN). Geneva.
  6. Henry, L. J., & Ginn, G.O. (2004). Prevention of workplace violence. In D. L. Huber (Eds.), Leadership and nursing care management, Philadelphia: Saunders, (2006). P.p. 675-692. Cited in Guidelines for Preventing Workplace Violence for Health Care & Social Service Workers, U.S. Department of LaborOccupational Safety &HealthAdministration(OSHA).www.OSHA.gov
  7. Injuries and violence prevention in the framework of the ILO/ICN/ WHO/PSI Joint Programme on Workplace Violence in the Health Sector. (2000). Geneva. [emailprotected]; International Council of Nurses. 3.
  8. International Labour Organization (ILO, the World Health Organization (WHO), Public Services International (PSI) and the International Council of Nurses (ICN), (2002). "Framework guidelines for addressing workplace violence in the health sector" during a meeting at ILO headquarters in Geneva.
  9. Jackson, D., Clare, J., & Mannix, J., (2002). Who would want to be a nurse? Violence in the workplace-A factor in recruitment and retention, Journal of Nursing Management.10, 13-20. Cited in Guidelines for Preventing Workplace Violence for Health Care & Social Service Workers, U.S. Department of LaborOccupational Safety & Health Administration(OSHA). (2004). www.OSHA.gov
  10. Mitus C M, (2011). Workplace Violence. Wild Iris Medical Education,Inc.
  11. Occupational Safety & Health Administration. (OSHA). (2003). (revised). Guidelines for preventing workplace violence for healthcare and social service workers.U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety & Health Administration. Washington, DC.
  12. Oxbridge Writers. (2011). Problems encountered by nursing students A study into violence, Oxbridge Writers: The UK's number one provider of custom essays from Oxford and Cambridge University qualified experts Oxbridge Essays Service.
  13. Violence in the Workplace. (2008). Washington State Nurses Association WSNABoard of Directors, Position Paper, March 21.
  14. Violence: Occupational hazards in hospitals, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). (2002). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Washington, DC.
  15. Wilburn S, Workplace Violence. (2012). The Washington State Nurses Association Continuing Education Provider Program.
  16. Woelfle, C. Y., & McCaffrey, R. Nurse on nurse, Nursing Forum. (2007). 42(3). P.p. 123-131. Cited in Guidelines for Preventing Workplace Violence for Health Care &

Identifiers

Download this PDF file

Statistics