التنافس الجيوسياسي على الممرات المائية: دراسة مقارنة بين قناة السويس وقناة بنما

Section: Articles
Issue
Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026)
Published
Jun 1, 2026
Pages
65-79

Abstract

 


Abstract:


    This study examines geopolitical competition over international maritime corridors through a comparative analysis of the Suez Canal and the Panama Canal, as two of the most critical maritime chokepoints in the global trading system. The research concludes that the Suez Canal enjoys greater geopolitical and operational resilience, whereas the Panama Canal faces increasing vulnerability due to climate change and water constraints. These challenges contribute to reshaping global trade patterns and encourage the diversification of transit routes. The study also presents a set of future scenarios that reflect potential trajectories of competition over strategic maritime corridors

References

  1. Belmadi, S. (2016). Geopolitics of Strategic Maritime Straits and Energy Security: The Strait of Malacca and its Impact on Chinese Energy Security as a Case Study. Algiers: University of Algiers.
  2. The Simplified Encyclopedia. (2005). Cairo: Egyptian Book House.
  3. Sky News Arabia. (2023, May 26). Chinese Investments of Half a Billion Dollars in the Suez Canal Area. Retrieved from Sky News Arabia: https://www.skynewsarabia.com/business/1624241-
  4. Acciaro, M. (2015). Climate Change Adaptation in the Panama Canal. In Climate Change and Adaptation Planning for Ports.
  5. Correa, E. (2025). How Certain Is the Continuity of the Panama Canal and How Will It Affect the Global Supply Chain Industry? Western Michigan University, Michigan, United States.
  6. Flint, F. (2017). Introduction to Geopolitics. London: London. Frémont, A. (2008). Les Routes Maritimes: Nouveaux Enjeux des Internationales. International Review and Strategy, 18.
  7. Levinson, M. (2016). The Box: How the Shipping Container Made the World Smaller and the World Economy Bigger. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  8. Ortiz, V. (2025). Sovereignty and national identity: the Panamanian perception of the geopolitical dispute over the Panama Canal. Frontiers in Political Science, https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2025.1713340/full.
  9. Ortolland, D., & Pirat, J.-P. (2010). Atlas Geopolitique des Espaces Maritimes. Paris: Technip.
  10. Rouvier, J. (1956, October). Canals and International Law. Le Monde Diplomatique.
  11. Scholvin, Sören. (2016). Finnish Institute of International Affairs.
  12. U.S. Congress. (1998). The Panama Canal: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Western Hemisphere Affairs. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
  13. U.S. Department of State. (2023). U.S. Engagement in Latin America and the Caribbean. Retrieved from https://www.state.gov/u-s-engagement-in-latin-america-and-the-caribbean/
  14. Ibrahim, M. (2023). Enhancing the Competitiveness of the Suez Canal in the Face of Competing and Alternative Routes. National Security and Strategy (1), 49.
  15. Al-Jubouri, H. (2024). The Impact of Climate Change on the Global Economy – The Panama Canal as an Example. Al-Furat Center for Strategic Studies, Iraq.
  16. Al-Jubouri, Q. (2019). Climate Change as a Variable in International Security. Journal of Political Science.
  17. Al-Aklah, M. (2011). Muhammad. Jordan-Amman: Dar Al-Thaqafa for Publishing and Distribution.
  18. Al-Kayyali, A. (1979). Encyclopedia of Politics (Vol. 6). Beirut: Encyclopedia of Politics.
  19. Al-Maw'id, H. S. (n.d.). Security of Arab Waterways. Damascus: Arab Writers Union.
  20. Al-Wali, M. (2023, December 28). The Status of the Suez Canal in the Egyptian Economy. Retrieved from Al Jazeera Net: https://www.aljazeera.net/ebusiness/2023/12/28/مكانة-قناة-السويس-في-الاقتصاد-المصري
  21. Amzarbah, M. (2024). The Impact of Geopolitical Crises on Global Maritime Transport. Journal of the Higher Institute for Qualitative Studies, 4(11), 188-189.
  22. Basit, S. (n.d.). The Panama Canal: Geopolitics of Straits and Seaways – A Map of Intertwined Global Interests and Stakes.
  23. Bard, R. (2021). Geopolitical Thought and Theoretical Readings of International Control Arrangements. Tabna Journal of Academic Scientific Studies, 4(2).
  24. Baraa Baraa, H. (2020). Hazem Ahmed. Amman, Jordan: Middle East University.
  25. Belmadi, S. (2016). Geopolitics of Strategic Seaways and Energy Supply Security: The Strait of Malacca and its Impact on Chinese Energy Security as a Model. Algiers: University of Algiers.
  26. Bouraoui, A. (2017). The Strategic Importance of Seaways in International Relations: A Case Study of the Strait of Malacca. Jijel, Algeria: Mohamed Seddik Ben Yahia University.
  27. Jaballah, M. (2023, September 7). The Impact of Climate on Competition between the Panama Canal and the Mexican Railway. Retrieved from Future Center for Advanced Research and Studies: https://futureuae.com/ar/Mainpage/Item/8831
  28. Jamil, N. (2024). Geopolitical Competition in the Indo-Pacific Region. Baghdad: Hammurabi Center for Research and Strategic Studies.
  29. Hassan, K. (2009). Political Geography: A Study of Land and Sea Regions, States, and the Impact of the Global System on Their Variables. Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Manhal Al-Lubnani.
  30. Hamdan, J. (1983). The Strategy of Colonialism and Liberation. Cairo: Dar Al-Hilal.
  31. Khatir, N. (2017). (The Geopolitical Importance of the Mediterranean Straits. Madarat Siyasiya Journal, 131-132.
  32. Khatir, N. (2017). The Geopolitical Importance of the Mediterranean Straits. Madarat Siyasiya Journal.
  33. Dandan, A. (2024). The Dilemma of Middle Eastern Maritime Routes in Light of Current Regional and Global Developments. Hammurabi Center for Research and Strategic Studies, Baghdad.
  34. Rajab, R. (2023). The Geostrategy of Maritime Straits and Global Energy Supplies: The Strait of Hormuz as a Model. Al-Israa University College Journal for Social and Human Sciences, 5(10).
  35. Riyadh, M. (2014). General Principles in Political Geography and Geopolitics. Cairo: Hindawi Foundation.
  36. Sultan, M. M. (2001). Introduction to Political Geography. Dubai, UAE: Dar Al-Qalam for Publishing and Distribution.
  37. Abdullah, A. (2008). Essam Sadiq. Egypt, Alexandria: Dar Al-Maarefa University.
  38. Ali, A. (2018). Maritime Geopolitics and Strategic Waterways in the International System. Beirut: Center for Arab Unity Studies.
  39. Amira, A. (2024, July 1). Trade Routes and Attempts to Monopolize Present Markets. Retrieved from Noonpost: https://www.noonpost.com/221080/
  40. Awadiya, A. (n.d.). The Panama Canal and its Geopolitical Importance in Global Trade. Retrieved from https://www.aljazeera.net/encyclopedia/2014/10/20/قناة-بنما
  41. Katea, F. (2021). The Geopolitical Importance of the Suez Canal in Regional and International Interactions. Journal of Strategic Studies - University of Baghdad.
  42. Manea, J. (2009). Public International Law: The National Sphere of the State. Algeria: Dar Al-Ulum for Publishing and Distribution.
  43. Mahmoud, S. (2011). Political Geography. Baghdad: Al-Intisar Press.
  44. Muhyiddin, J. (2009). International Law of the Sea. Algeria: Dar Al-Khaldounia for Publishing and Distribution.
  45. Malindi, M. (n.d.). International Waterways. Retrieved from the Specialized Legal Encyclopedia: https://arab-ency.com.sy/law
  46. Huwaidi, A. (1979). Strategic Areas in the Red Sea. Arab Future Journal, 26.
  47. Energy Research Unit. (2023, December 27). Suez Canal Revenues Reach Record High in 2023. Retrieved from the Energy Platform: https://chatgpt.com/c/694b7241-5e54-8327-b5db-965926da1c13#:~:text=https%3A//attaqa.net/2023/12/27

Author

حامد صالح مروة الحمداني

Identifiers

https://doi.org/10.33899/rjps.v2i3.60535
Download this PDF file
التنافس الجيوسياسي على الممرات المائية: دراسة مقارنة بين قناة السويس وقناة بنما (العربية)

Statistics

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC