Allegations of Misconduct

RJS is very sensitive to research misconduct and uses all means available to prevent publishing miscounted research. Though there is no a standard definition of research misconduct, the Council of Science Editors defines research misconduct broadly in three categories of action and conducts

RJS uses this definition of the misconduct in its dealing with the issue and follows strictly the COPE follow the chart in dealing with research misconduct.  In addition, for each component of the research misconduct, RJS has many assurance policies as follows

Mistreatment of research subjects

Falsification and Fabrication of data

Piracy and Plagiarism

 

 Protection of human subjects:

RJS does not publish manuscripts that do not declare a statement about the protection of human subjects. Normally, the journal requires that a statement is declared that research has been reviewed by an institutional review board (IRB) either in the material method section of the manuscript or in the acknowledgment section of the manuscript. MNJ encourages authors to report the registry number of the IRB in countries that where a central registrar of the IRB exists as it is the case in the I Republic of Iran.

 

Falsification and Fabrication of data:

Fabrication is defined as making up of data without actually collecting or synthesizing scientific data. Falsification is defined as the manipulation of research material in order to reach a favorable result. Fabrication and falsification could happen at any stage of research (in the field) up to the publication of a manuscript where misuse of citation can happen (referencing a citation when the citation does not support the argument). RJS tries to identify any kind of fabrication or falsification in all levels of manuscript processing, from initial screening to comprehensive evaluation of a revised manuscript and even after a manuscript has been published. Report of any fabrication and falsification is an ethical duty of our authors, co-authors, reviewers, editors, and readers. In any event of falsification or fabrication, RJS keeps its right to retract or withdraw the fabricated or falsified article. RJS strictly follows the COPE follow the chart in dealing with fabrication and falsification.

 

Plagiarism:

Plagiarism is defined as the appropriation of another person''''s ideas, processes, results, or words without giving appropriate credit.  Another category of plagiarism is self-plagiarism when the author published his own idea, data, and text in different journals when no need for such duplication exists. RJS uses all means to detect plagiarism. As a matter of quality assurance, a similarity of more than 20 percent in the text of a manuscript will be returned to the author to remove the similarities and reduce the chance of plagiarism.  RJS strictly follows the COPE follow the chart in dealing with plagiarized articles.